Health CareHealth Care ReformLegislation & Regulation

No Sympathy For Wal-Mart’s Health Insurance Troubles

Walmart (No Sympathy for Joo!)You may have heard the news earlier this week: Wal-Mart announced that it will soon do away with health insurance for approximately 30,000 of its part-time workers.
From the AP:

Wal-Mart told The Associated Press that starting Jan. 1, it will no longer offer health insurance to employees who work less than an average of 30 hours a week. The move affects 30,000 employees, or about 5 percent of Wal-Mart’s total part-time workforce, but comes after the company already had scaled back the number of part-time workers who were eligible for health insurance coverage since 2011.
The announcement follows similar decisions by Target, Home Depot and others to completely eliminate health insurance benefits for part-time employees. It also comes a day after Wal-Mart said it is teaming up with an online health insurance agency called to help customers shop for health insurance plans.

You might be thinking: how sad for workers to be kicked off their private insurance plans. Well, according to the progressive types over at ThinkProgress, you’d be wrong! They’ve explained that these employees can now go look for Obamacare plans paid for by taxpayers.
From ThinkProgress:

On top of that, since Obamacare’s insurance marketplaces give people a new option for getting insured that isn’t dependent on their employer, the part-time Walmart workers who are losing their coverage aren’t necessarily in a bad spot. They can probably get cheaper and more comprehensive health policies on the marketplaces, thanks to the federal subsidies that will help them pay for those plans. Federal subsidies are only available to people whose employers don’t offer them health insurance through their job.
“If part-time workers do get benefits, it’s often skimpy coverage and they have to pay a lot for it,” Levitt explained. “But, under the Affordable Care Act, simply getting offered benefits at work makes you ineligible for premium subsidies in the new health insurance exchanges. So, low-wage part-time workers are probably better off not getting offered skimpy coverage and instead applying for subsidies in health insurance exchanges.”

This is just another example of the unholy alliance between big government and big corporations. If a corporation wants to cut employee health insurance costs, it can dump employees onto public exchanges.
Another nugget from the AP article gives Wal-Mart’s incredibly lame explanation for having to cancel some part-time plans:

The announcement comes after Wal-Mart said far more U.S. employees and their families are enrolling in its health care plans than it had expected following rollout of the Affordable Care Act, which requires big companies to offer coverage to employees working 30 hours or more a week or face a penalty. It also requires most Americans to have health insurance or pay a penalty.

Now, I’m sympathetic to 99 percent of companies struggling with employee health insurance problems in a post-Obamacare world. However, because Wal-Mart lobbied for the employer mandate, a key aspect of Obamacare, in 2009 when the policy was being debated, my sympathy for them is a bit more nuanced. That was a classic case of a politically-connected corporation using government to crowd out competition — and now you (and every other taxpayer) will be footing the bill for health insurance for some of their employees.

Please follow and like us:

2 thoughts on “No Sympathy For Wal-Mart’s Health Insurance Troubles

  • How refreshing to see a political blog report on Wal-Mart with a fair view of things. Usually the left reflexively hates them and the right is bought and paid for by them. Keep up the good work Caleb!

  • joseph elster

    In the meantime. insurance cost is going up…while coverage is being reduced.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Arkansas Project