Oh, Tina Sherman, How I Have Missed You (Updated!)

A note from LT apprises us that the long-awaited Tina Sherman/McDonalds/nude photos case is going down today, and we’re getting updates from Morning News of NWA reporter Christopher Spencer on the Twitter, of course. Perhaps most importantly, it means I get to use the not Tina Sherman photo again, after an absence of many weeks.

She thought I'd forgotten about her.

Let justice be done, though the heavens fall! And more importantly, let’s get a look at that evidence table. TwitPics, please, Mr. Spencer.

UPDATE: McDonalds wanted the suit dismissed, but the judge says ‘no dice,’ reports the Northwest Arkansas Times Scott “F.” Davis.

Best part of the story: Sherman’s attorney notes that “more than 1 million people have searched Google looking for information about the case after the story about her clients’ lawsuit made international news.”

Please follow and like us:

5 thoughts on “Oh, Tina Sherman, How I Have Missed You (Updated!)

  • April 3, 2009 at 9:21 pm
    Permalink

    >>David, I think the girl your using may look better than the real thing. What says you?

    Reply
  • April 3, 2009 at 11:26 pm
    Permalink

    Yeah, yeah, yeah, everyone wants to see nude pictures of Tina Sherman. What I want to see are the nude pictures of Tina Johnson. She’s the home schooling mother of three that was such a big Asa supporter back in 2005.

    Reply
  • April 4, 2009 at 8:19 am
    Permalink

    Rick,
    We all agreed several months ago that we would pretend that photo is Tina Sherman, for precisely the reason you outline.
    D.

    Reply
  • April 4, 2009 at 8:25 am
    Permalink

    “more than 1 million people have searched Google…”

    That is statistically misleading because I personally was responsible for 957,121 of those times. So, 1 million’s not really that big of a deal.

    Reply
  • April 4, 2009 at 10:51 am
    Permalink

    Oh how I remember Tina Johnson…

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *