Occupy Little Rock Is Taking It To The Streets

From each according to their ability...

Well, Little Rock, I have news for you…you are now officially an occupied territory.

The Occupy Little Rock demonstration, a localized offshoot of the Occupy Wall Street movement, hit the streets of downtown Little Rock Saturday morning to push their message of fighting corporate power.  John Lyon from  the Arkansas News Bureau was on scene and he contributes a fine write-up of the affair.

Yeah, there was some of the usual alienating leftist claptrap—perhaps too much for a movement that hopes to reach out to “the 99 percent” of mainstream Americans who aren’t billionaires. And so you had the goofy chants (“Humans first! Humans first!”) and declarations of “Solidarity!” You had the unfocused, catch-all list of grievances (one speaker listed the societal ills we can lay at the feet of “the 1 percent,” which includes not only the rotten economy but also “watered-down” health care reform and child obesity).

There was the odd dynamic whereby each speaker approached the microphone, introduced him or herself by first name, and the crowd greeted them by name, which gave the event the feel of a giant open-air 12-step recovery meeting. There was the punctilious campus organizer’s obsession with ensuring equality of form, since according to the rules, each male speaker had to be followed by a female speaker “to keep it fair.”

But on the plus side, all the participants were perfectly pleasant, organized, polite and well-behaved, with one speaker reminding everyone to pick up any trash they might see as they departed the Capitol. While there was plenty of sharp rhetoric directed at reining in overweening corporate power, the overall vibe was positive and even kind of cheerful. The turn-out of some 400-500 people was impressive (though the demonstration would have packed greater punch on a weekday).

At least one speaker, who chided himself and the crowd for their past “apathy” and urged everyone to read the Constitution, was touching on sentiments that wouldn’t have been out of place at a Tea Party rally two years ago. In fact, as the group marched its way to the Capitol, I was delighted to spot Rob Richard, a tireless libertarian activist and Ron Paul enthusiast who’s a long-time favorite of The Arkansas Project, hoisting an “End the Fed” sign.

Is there a potential for this movement to grow into something more consequential? It’s certainly possible, though I don’t believe “left populism” is as easy a sell as left-leaning populists like to think. That said, I’ve grown hesitant about dismissing grassroots organizing and mass dissent, since in the last decade they’ve shown a capacity for achieving an impact far beyond their initial expectations (like the aforementioned Tea Party movement, or the 2003-2004 Howard Dean primary campaign, which sowed the seeds for a liberal resurgence in 2006 and 2008).

Meanwhile, here’s one blogger who sees the potential for a alliance between anti-corporate Occupiers and anti-government Tea Partiers that reaches beyond tired left and right categories. He correctly diagnoses that the root of the problem isn’t just corporate power or government power, but the unholy collusion of the two:

The greatest threat to our economy is neither corporations nor the government. The greatest threat to our economy is both of them working together. There are currently two sizable coalitions of angry citizens that are almost on the same page about that, and they’re too busy insulting each other to notice.

Of course, for an alliance to happen, the dude with the Karl Marx quoting sign in the banner photo above probably oughta cool it. That ain’t exactly a message with mass crossover appeal.

Occupying Little Rock collage

Random sampling of messages on signs at Occupy Little Rock demonstration: 

Boycott foreign products/Buy American Made Only

“Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable”—JFK

From each according to their ability, to each according to their need

Democracy is human-powered

Repeal Citizens United

A corporation cannot  have a grandchild

Separation of corporation and state

This is what democracy looks like

Christians against corporate privacy and greed

The sheep are happier of themselves than under the rule of wolves

Dissent is the highest form of patriotism

Moloch!

Single-payer Medicare for all

“Corporation” isn’t in the Constitution

This is a sign

Check out the Occupy Little Rock Facebook page

Check out more photos from the Arkansas Times. 

 

Please follow and like us:

2 thoughts on “Occupy Little Rock Is Taking It To The Streets

  • Pingback: Protest Pissing Match: Occupy Little Rock vs. Tea Party

  • October 19, 2011 at 2:43 am
    Permalink

    I was the guy holding the “Marxist” sign at the top.

    I’m curious: how is the concept of working hard to ensure the well-being of yourself and everyone around you in any way contrary to the ideals on which our country was founded? Although Karl Marx popularized the quote, the sentiment predates him considerably; in fact, if you read the other side of my sign, I also included a selection from the Book of Acts in the Bible, in which we see the early church engaging in exactly the kind of activity prescribed by the aforementioned quote: “No one claimed that any of their possessions was their own, but they shared everything they had.” (Acts 4:32) For those of you unfamiliar, believers were selling their property and giving the proceeds to the apostles to be distributed fairly amongst those who had need. It’s a worthwhile read, and only one of many sections of the Bible that advocate radical sharing.

    If you take the statement at face value – “From each according to their ability, to each according to their need” – you’ll find the basis for a philosophy of mutual care and responsibility in which each person takes responsibility for their communities. I don’t believe that this is something that governments can successfully mandate; rather, it’s a principle I try to live my life by, and it’s my firm conviction that if more of us took that idea to heart rather than dismissing it because one person happened to repeat it in a book he wrote, we’d be in a much better world.

    I made the sign because I wanted to get people thinking and talking; I wanted people to ask themselves why we’ve become such slaves to the false premise that we survive based solely on our own merits and are responsible for only ourselves. To that end, I’d be happy to continue the discussion with anyone who’s interested. I’m never above admitting that I’m wrong!

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *