Jingle Bells, Townsell Tales, The Cabin Laid An Egg

A replica of Conway's Christmas tree.
A replica of Conway’s Christmas tree.

Apparently I upset some people with my story about Conway’s new 54-foot, $130,000 Christmas tree: the local paper here in town, The Log Cabin Democrat, has not one but two stories in their Sunday edition today that take aim at my coverage of the con-tree-versy. For whatever reason, they decided to dedicate quite a bit of column space to attempt to debunk some of the claims about the purchase of the gargantuan tannenbaum  — but strangely, they attempt to debunk claims that I never actually made.
The first story begins with a bang:

An online alternative news website’s story claiming that Conway illegally or improperly “amended the city code” to purchase its Christmas tree from an Arkansas vendor has been making the social media rounds this week.

(I don’t know what an “alternative news website” is, but hey, at least we’re stars on social media.)
The author, Joe Lamb, continues:

The Arkansas Project story also claims that the purchase violated Conway Municipal Code § 3.04.02.

However, these allegations of allegations are flatly false. What I actually said was:

…the city council voted in August to carve out an exemption to the competitive bidding requirement for Get Lit.

That is in fact what the city did — they exempted this purchase from the bidding requirement. To my knowledge, that’s what you call it when you pass an ordinance that overrides an existing law and allows one company/transaction to operate outside of the standard rules. In fact, the title of their ordinance is “An ordinance waiving competitive bids for the purchase of holiday Christmas decor…” Waiving, exempting. Most people consider these words to be synonymous.
Here’s another quote from my original story:

So, why did the city amend the law and make a special exception for this company?

See what I did there? I used another word that’s generally considered to be synonymous with “waiving:” exception. I also said the city amended the law, not violated it. In my view, those are very different things. Apparently this distinction is lost on the Cabin.
And they weren’t done with me yet! The Cabin also ran a gem of an editorial on this subject. Here’s a taste:

And then there were claims that the tree was not only wrong or bad or foolish, but full-on illegal. There was an online story by the Arkansas Project…

Once again, this claim of a claim is bogus. What I actually said is that the city exempted this purchase from competitive bidding — a premise that no one seems to dispute. (Oh, and by the way, it’s public record.)
The only part of my story that might need updating is my claim that the city’s regular policy is to accept bids on projects over $10,000. According to the Cabin’s great investigative work, apparently the city passed an ordinance in 2010 that was intended to make their bidding requirements mirror the requirements set forth by the state. According to Mayor Tab Townsell and City Attorney Mike Murphy, this new ordinance (O-10-125) “repeals by implication” the old ordinance that required bids on items of more than $10,000 and replaces it with a new threshold of $20,000. Now, the ordinance they cite doesn’t spell out the new bidding policy, but it does adopt “City of Conway Purchasing Policies and Procedure.” According to the Cabin, this new policy says the city will use the state’s guidelines for bidding. This also, according to their report, gives the city the leeway to waive bidding when they want: the state provides a provision for city’s to waive the bidding requirements “in exceptional situations where this procedure is deemed not feasible or practical,” per A.C.A. § 14-58-303 (b)(1)(B).
I haven’t been able to find a copy of the new policy online, but I’ve requested a copy from the city. Assuming the Cabin’s categorization of the new policy is correct, I’d be happy to concede the point that the city’s bidding threshold is set at $20,000 instead of $10,000 because 1. I never alleged the city did anything illegal and 2. This doesn’t change the fact that the city did waive bidding, which was one of my main concern from the beginning, due to the lack of transparency and excess cost to the taxpayers.
The Cabin should’ve known what my main concerns were which is why their claims against The Arkansas Project are so bizarre. How might they have known, you ask? I listed them in my original story (notably absent from the list: a claim that the city had broken the law). All of these concerns still stand and, to my knowledge, none of these concerns have been publicly disputed by the city or the Cabin:

1. The city’s competitive bidding requirement was circumvented for the benefit of one particular company

2. A quick Google search reveals multiple comparable Christmas trees for about half the price of the one sold by Get Lit

3. Whoever is benefiting, it sure isn’t the taxpayers

I’m just thinking out loud, but perhaps the Cabin’s time would be better spent getting answers to these concerns rather than putting words in my mouth. So far, they don’t seem to be that worried about the concerns I actually raised in my story (although they did like concern #2) — they’re mostly worried about the concerns I didn’t raise.
And since the Cabin seems to be desperate for story ideas, here’s a tip: there might be a pretty good story buried in the mayor’s evolving explanations for why competitive bidding was waived in the first place. He originally said the purchase was exempted from bidding because of “time constraints,” but now says it was “waived because of the practical advantages of buying from an Arkansas company.” I suppose both answers could be acceptable, but the Cabin doesn’t appear to be interested in examining these different excuses explanations that were printed in their own paper. They’re apparently more interested in trying to smear me. Regardless of their motivations, this effort is a great distraction from the real issues at hand.

Please follow and like us:

11 thoughts on “Jingle Bells, Townsell Tales, The Cabin Laid An Egg

  • December 1, 2013 at 10:53 pm
    Permalink

    My, how loudly they protest in Conway when the City’s one-party / one-view governance is questioned!

    Reply
  • December 2, 2013 at 1:10 am
    Permalink

    What I would like to find out is how the mayor borrowed money from the Sanitation dept not once but twice to meet payroll and supposedly paid it back. If that was the case why all of a sudden did the Sanitation dept request a rate increase when they were dang near floating in money? Another thing is who exactly are the members of the Conway Development Board? All I ever get is the run around, they are the development arm for the City of Conway. Do tell. Is that why they think it is a good idea to sell the old airport so cheap? A little over 5 million for a parcel that large is a joke, I was thinking it should be at least 15 or 20 million dollars. And the city tells all they will invest $18 million dollars for infrastructure work? Are you kidding me? How many more of our local roads must suffer through the cities stupidity?

    Reply
  • December 2, 2013 at 7:16 pm
    Permalink

    The name says it all “The Log Cabin Dumbocrat “. Just another rag that is part of the smear,lie and twist the truth hacks and scumbags. I do not read their thrash, and do not shop in their town and sure as heck ain’t going to go see the double priced tree. I don’t think it is a tree. The pic I saw was a erector set. The symbold of send money and paying taxes(stealing). Hum Bug to Christmas. For all the idiots of there it ain’t and never was abouy Santa C. it is about my LORD and SAVIOUR. When your are burning in Hell I will throw you a xmas tree.
    no santa, no tree dan’o
    HE DIED for Your SINS

    Reply
  • December 3, 2013 at 4:32 pm
    Permalink

    Funny how you guys sound like trailer trash complaining about a Mayor who grew an economy during the biggest recession of our lives. Generated more jobs and grew a population 20% in 5 Years..sad to see outsiders criticize things they do not understand. Maybe it was a little overpriced but you can do things like that when you grow an economy and a city the RIGHT way. Sorry I know most of you just go to work and dont fully understand municipalities or how they are ran effectively. I am confident based upon the vocabulary in the comments that you people are not qualified to do anything but be laborers not elected officials or even people that attend city council meetings.You dont Understand budgets, city code, how to create code, contracts, bids, economic development, community expansion, waste management organization, or any other issues the council faces on a daily basis. I would even venture to say no one in your respective cities really know you or respect your opinions which is why you share them on this obscure website. But yea if you want to see good city Gov why dont you try to look respectable and come to a city council meeting in Conway and you will see what economic growth and community leadership look like, (and yes I do criticize you because your lack of knowledge shows your laziness and laziness is a trait we can all criticize)

    Reply
  • December 3, 2013 at 4:36 pm
    Permalink

    I understand if you moderator don’t want to post my quotes…….but your site is so popular I bet it don’t matter. What is this called again….didn’t Kincade run something like this is like 07? I though it died

    Reply
    • December 4, 2013 at 12:34 pm
      Permalink

      Dude, chill out. It often takes me more than 4 minutes to approve a comment.

      Reply
  • Pingback: Ethics, Legality, and the Proverbial Straw Man | Daniel Geraldson

  • December 3, 2013 at 6:56 pm
    Permalink

    FINE but , there are alot of people who work picking up trash and doing the labor out there and they are denied there Christmas bonus ,and raises that they were told the city did not have any money but had a crap load of money for this dang tree please explain that to those workers who have families. !!!!

    Reply
  • December 4, 2013 at 10:15 am
    Permalink

    Of course, the University couldn’t have been a factor in the growth of Conway. It had to be the mayor and what he did, right? As someone who has attended many city council meetings and has analyzed multiple city budgets, your comment here strikes me as arrogant and uninformed. I would venture to say that you likely have a personal stake in the issue and take offense only because it is corruption close to your heart that is being called into question.

    Reply
  • Pingback: How Government Should Do Stuff With Christmas Trees | The Arkansas Project

  • Pingback: O $130,000 Christmas tree, thy leaves are so expensive « Watchdog.org

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *