About That Blue Hog Report Business….

You see, in this scenario, blogger Matt Campbell would be Billy Joel, throwing a stone at a glass house, though he was living in one himself. Is that clear?

Ugh, blogging about blogging…that is just the worst. I had promised myself I’d stop doing that (sometime after this), because really, who cares? At a certain point, please, shut up with the gassing about blogging and social media and the tools and just write some stuff, am I right?

But the saga of the Blue Hog Report (BHR), a liberal blog that shut down last week after the Arkansas GOP started asking questions about the proprietors’ state employment, is ripe for discussion. Let us discuss!

You can get a solid, balanced write-up here. It boils down to this: a couple of guys, Matt Campbell and Jeff Woodmansee, were running a rather partisan blogging/journalism operation at the BHR. It was quite well done! The blog did a marvelous job of exploring the bumbling of the bumbling Secretary of State Mark Martin, a bumbling Republican, in particular.

The state GOP noticed said bloggers were state employees and started asking questions through Freedom of Information Act requests—the same types of questions Campbell was asking about employees of the secretary of state’s office. In response, Campbell quickly killed the site and all his associated social media accounts.

Several bloggers rushed to the BHR team’s defense, decrying the “suppression of speech” and attacking the Arkansas GOP’s political motivations.  These responses strike me as overheated and beside the point.

Before we slip the crown of thorns atop Matt Campbell’s head, he didn’t really handle this so well, did he? It seems like he would have done better to declare his state employment publicly, wouldn’t it, rather than disguising it? He did disclose SOME things about himself: We knew he was a lawyer, and if you were a regular reader of his blog, you knew he was married with a couple of kids.

He was happy to disclose things about himself, yet at no point did he disclose he was an employee of the Arkansas Supreme Court. That seems like, y’know, kind of a relevant thing. Moreover, he wrote some pretty hard-hitting stuff honing in on how other state employees spent their time, so he painted a big target on himself. He was leading with his chin. Those who live in glass houses, etc. I am now out of cliches to illustrate this point.

For example, on May 4, Campbell wrote a funny post detailing how Princella Smith, then an employee of the secretary of state’s office, was spending her days, based on published sources. He insinuated that the only way Smith could have worked a full 8-hour day, as she claimed, was through time travel, based on his reading of the public record. (I would link to it but, as I noted, his site is gone).

But since Campbell was a state employee, too, as we now know, it seems like someone could have constructed a timeline and asked similarly pertinent questions about how he spends HIS time, based upon the time stamps of his blog and social media accounts. Perhaps that’s why he disappeared the BHR site and all associated accounts so swiftly upon the GOP’s filing of the FOIA request?

The way this has played out makes it appear that he had not thought through the consequences of his actions, which, if you’re going to blog, you should probably do. Example: When my old sparring partner Blake Rutherford left to take a state job in the attorney general’s office, he folded his blogging operation, the much-missed Blake’s Shark Tank, wisely surmising that trying to wear both hats would only lead to trouble. Blake was a good deal wiser than Campbell, wasn’t he?

None of this is to defend the Arkansas GOP, because, ugh, those guys. Politically, the move was a ham-fisted, disproportionate response, and will only serve to turn Campbell and his associate bloggers into martyrs. Vendettas against media people rarely pay out much in the way of dividends.

But it’s well within the GOP’s rights to file a FOIA request with the state, so people should stop whining about their motivations. It’s a legal mechanism, a tool, and they made use of it. The motivations with which the tool is deployed are irrelevant if there is a question of government accountability and appropriate use of taxpayer funds. In Campbell’s case, reasonable questions could be raised based upon the timing of his blog posts and frequent social media engagement.

Meanwhile, blogger Jason Tolbert at the Tolbert Report, whose well-earned reputation for diligence is only matched by his excitable and histrionic streak, has now shut down HIS blog as…as what, a gesture of dissident solidarity? When the story broke Tolbert was complaining about “suppression of free speech,” which he’s apparently now countering by suppressing his own speech. Take that! So I guess Tolbert will shortly be declaring war against the Republican Party of Arkansas, which we can add to his ongoing wars against Mike Huckabee and proofreading.

What a mess. And the thing is, does the loss of a blog or other social media voice matter? No. (Pro-Campbell blogger Michael Tilley at The City Wire in Fort Smith makes this point ably.) The great strength of a distributed information network is that some players fade away and are replaced by new players. Sometimes, old players fade away, but then try to make ill-conceived comebacks, even though everybody was kind of glad they had gone away in the first place and wishes they would have just stayed gone. Ahem.

But ultimately, there will be enough voices that efforts to target any one of them will prove fruitless. Which will prove to be the case with the GOP’s effort to target Campbell and the Blue Hog Report.

Please follow and like us:
error

14 thoughts on “About That Blue Hog Report Business….

  • May 31, 2011 at 11:19 am
    Permalink

    I’m just happy TAP is back!

    Reply
  • Pingback:Is the shutting down of Matt Campbell’s blog at start of a war? (Part 5 of Series on Blue Hog Report) « HaltingArkansasLiberalswithTruth

  • May 31, 2011 at 1:17 pm
    Permalink

    Pat,
    Thanks very much. I’ve added ArkansasFOI site to the blogroll at the bottom right of the page. I look forward to seeing the site develop.
    D.

    Reply
  • May 31, 2011 at 4:42 pm
    Permalink

    Damn good points.

    Glad your back old friend…

    Reply
  • May 31, 2011 at 5:58 pm
    Permalink

    He’s back. I’ve not been this excited about a return since Coke Classic killed off that vile New Coke crap they tried to push on us! Yes, that’s right, TAP is as good as Coke Classic.

    Reply
  • May 31, 2011 at 7:23 pm
    Permalink

    TAP and FRR show up and BHR and Tolbert disappear…all in the same week. Things are looking up around here. You boys better not be state employees or working for the Baptists or you might get cut off too. Hard to smoke good cigars and drink fine scotch with that GOP tape in a big X over your mouth. You know how those guys like to suppress free speech and make you take down your websites.

    Reply
  • May 31, 2011 at 8:13 pm
    Permalink

    Sorry but what difference does it make where they work? How is that a bearing on any post they did? Did they talk about supreme court bidness? Nope! Did they post about libraries? Nope. Your just kickin up mud buddy.

    Reply
  • May 31, 2011 at 9:07 pm
    Permalink

    So, Ken, by that logic, it is okay for someone in Mark Darr’s office to campaign for Tim Griffin on state time. As long as they aren’t pushing an agenda that has nothing directly related to their office, it is okay? Really? I thought the state law said no political activity regardless of what it is or who it is for is illegal. But according to you, it is okay if it isn’t related to where they work.
    Gotcha.

    Reply
  • June 1, 2011 at 1:07 pm
    Permalink

    The ArkansasFOI.com website is hiding behind an anonymous domain registration. Beware, it could be a ‘honey-trap’ in information industry parlance.

    Here is a better one, it’s been operating for years by known entities –

    http://FOIArkansas.com/

    Reply
  • June 2, 2011 at 3:45 pm
    Permalink

    Kinkade shows back up with a test pattern and a Billy Joel album cover? I seem to remember hot chicks. Next thing you know he’ll be back on twitter & Facebook and totally overexposed again. Some one needs to file an FOI on him quick.

    Good to have you back David.

    Reply
  • June 4, 2011 at 10:29 pm
    Permalink

    Great points and my thoughts exactly. BHR loved exposing Republicans for these types of “conflicts”. Funny how they didn’t like it when the magnifying glass was pointed in their direction. I really don’t think this move has a political cost for the state GOP because, really, who gives a crap whether any political state blog shuts down except losers like us. Given BHR’s haughtily superior tone over it’s lifetime it was exquisite to watch them turn tail and run after getting a taste of their own medicine. What’s shocking is that the state GOP could actually pull this off.

    Glad you are back, by the way.

    Reply
  • June 6, 2011 at 12:04 am
    Permalink

    Absolutely thrilled you are back!! Got a real kick out of the Billy Joel album cover, too.

    Many employees of private companies are restricted from access to Facebook, and the like on their work computers–for the sake of company efficiency.

    In this vein, what an employee does on his work computer is at some point the business of the employer, this should be more important if one is paid from public money. I don’t feel comfortable with state computers or time on state employment being used for running a blog. If it wasn’t being done on state time or on a state computer, why take the blog down?

    Looks pretty fishy if you ask me.

    Reply
  • June 14, 2011 at 5:59 pm
    Permalink

    Fourche River Rex,,

    You seem to be making assumptions based on thin air. Give me some facts to support your conclusions. If no facts, then this is the same as 7th graders calling each other names.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *