9 Responses to “Name Game: Greenberg on Edifice Complex in NYT”

  1. Jason Tolbert Says:

    Good for Dan but isn’t that bill over two years old? Does it take that long for dispatches from Arkansas to reach the New York Times.

  2. David Kinkade Says:

    We sent off the press release via wagon team in mid-2007, but half died of typhus en route and the rest were killed in an Indian ambush. It was tragic. The worst part was that all of this happened before they’d reached the Pulaski County line.
    D.

  3. Fourche River Rex Says:

    I want a building named after me. Just call me Edifice Rex.

  4. nick cochran Says:

    So no Dan Greenberg Library? I personally don’t believe in school namings at all beyond the name of the town or the street on which it located. If God wanted us to name our schools he would have told us so.

  5. don castleberry Says:

    made me wonder how many, and where, schools were named for president Bill?

  6. Greenberg: 'It's OK To Disagree With Other People' | The Arkansas Project Says:

    [...] Read the whole thing. It’s not Greenberg’s first appearance in Reason—he was profiled last fall. And earlier this week, Greenberg was interviewed by the New York Times about his “Edifice Complex Prevention Act.” [...]

  7. Barbara Says:

    Didn’t the Founding Fathers insert an edifice complex prevention provision into the U.S. Constitution (as amended)?

  8. Another Roadblock for “Monuments to Me” | The Arkansas Project Says:

    [...] Based on the incredible resistance I faced in the Arkansas General Assembly when trying to block politicians from naming things after themselves, I had no idea that I was part of a larger movement! Previous post dealing with similar issues here. [...]

  9. New ‘Edifice Complex’ Development: The Use of Force | The Arkansas Project Says:

    [...] Previous discussion of “Edifice Complex” issues in Arkansas here and here. [...]

Bad Behavior has blocked 692 access attempts in the last 7 days.