Comments on: Max Brantley, Dancing As Fast As He Can

By: Rich Cosgrove

Rich Cosgrove — Sat, 28 Feb 2009 02:57:13 +0000

Y’all please leave poor Max Brantley alone. What’s the point in hounding him. After all, as my grandpa used to say: “obtuseness is its own protection against punishment or improvement.”

By: MsIndependent

MsIndependent — Wed, 25 Feb 2009 21:39:02 +0000

Available from the phone book: [Heh. MsIndependent found Max Brantley's home address and number and posted it here. Point is well taken. I doubt Max would care that much one way or another, but I don't publish people's personal info here, period. So I'm taking it down from this site. The address is readily available elsewhere, and you're all welcome to publish it on your own real estate. — David Kinkade, TheArkansasProject.com]

By: Letalis Maximus, Esq.

Letalis Maximus, Esq. — Sat, 21 Feb 2009 22:59:28 +0000

So start publishing the names, addresses, phone numbers, and other private yet public information relating to Max and his employers.

By: nemo

nemo — Tue, 17 Feb 2009 15:22:22 +0000

Remember, Max rhymes with tax. He’s never met one he didn’t like…

By: Joe Michael P

Joe Michael P — Tue, 17 Feb 2009 05:23:12 +0000

We all know Max has one eye. It must be his left since that is the only side he ever sees…

By: David Kinkade

David Kinkade — Tue, 17 Feb 2009 02:26:40 +0000

Perhaps one of our legal-eagle readers knows more about that, Rex, but I’d be mightily surprised if home addresses were excluded as sensitive or personal information.
D.

By: Fourche River Rex

Fourche River Rex — Tue, 17 Feb 2009 02:23:55 +0000

Doesn’t FOI require that certain sensative information be redacted? Would home addresses not be included in this? Would ASP not have a responsibility to redact all such information before passing it on to the Times? Could the Times not be civilly liable for dessminating personal information? Could there be a lawsuit against the ASP and the Times if the NRA or any other well funded organization took note that personal information was made public?

By: Cameron Bluff

Cameron Bluff — Tue, 17 Feb 2009 01:06:02 +0000

Yeah, what Bill from Sheridan said.

By: Bill from Sheridan

Bill from Sheridan — Mon, 16 Feb 2009 23:49:22 +0000

Max Brantley is a googly-eyed chicken shit that doesn’t give a damn for good government. Max is for the government getting ever larger and taxing more of what you earn. If allowing the people to have more insight into how their government functions will further his goals than he is for it. If not allowing the people to look into their govenment is against his goals he’s against it.