• Home
  • About Us
  • Advance Arkansas Institute
  • Sponsors
  • Donate
  • Scorecards & Questionnaires
    • 2016 Judicial Candidate Questionnaire
    • 2016 Legislative Primary Questionnaire
    • 2011 Voting Record
    • 2013 Voting Record
    • 2015 Voting Record
  • Contact

The Arkansas Project

News and Views on Politics, Policy and More

  • Economy
    • Arkansas Budget
    • Debt
    • Economic Policy
    • Federal Budget
    • Jobs
    • Spending
      • State Spending
      • Federal Spending
    • Taxes
      • Arkansas Taxes
      • Federal Taxes
      • Tax Reform
  • Health Care
    • Medicaid
    • Medicare
    • Obamacare
    • Private Option
  • Government
    • Government Waste
    • Our Rights
      • 1st Amendment
      • 2nd Amendment
      • Civil Liberties
      • Property Rights
    • Smaller Government
    • Transparency
      • Freedom Of Information
  • Law
    • Legislation & Regulation
    • Tort Reform
    • Arkansas Constitution
    • US Constitution
  • Politics
    • Arkansas Politics
      • Arkansas Legislature
      • Constitutional Officers
    • Elections
      • 2016 State Elections
      • 2016 Federal Elections
      • Voter Fraud
      • Voter ID
    • Judiciary
    • Local Politics
    • National Politics
  • Education
    • K-12
    • Higher Education
    • Education Reform
  • Arkansas Media
  • Podcasts

Mark Pryor: Saving Kids from Old Books

August 18, 2014 Marc Kilmer

saveskids-01When you think of unsafe children’s products, you probably don’t think of books. Outside of our one-year-old smacking me in the head with one of his board books, I have a difficult time imagining a less threatening product than a children’s book. Why, then, did Senator Mark Pryor’s child safety legislation label children’s books as such a threat?

To be fair to Senator Pryor, I don’t think that children’s books were the target when he shepherded the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act (CPSIA) through the Senate. But the bill’s language did cover books. Older books, those written before 1985, were under particular threat. That posed big problems for libraries, second-hand bookstores, and resellers of older children’s books.

Walter Olson (whose blog, Overlawyered, has been invaluable for this series) explains why older books were in trouble:

Not until 1985 did it become unlawful to use lead pigments in the inks, dyes, and paints used in children’s books. Before then—and perhaps particularly in the great age of children’s-book illustration that lasted through the early twentieth century—the use of such pigments was not uncommon, and testing can still detect lead residues in books today.

Olson notes that even though these older books may have had lead in their ink, there was no reason to think they posed any harm to children:

While lead poisoning from other sources, such as paint in old houses, remains a serious public health problem in some communities, no one seems to have been able to produce a single instance in which an American child has been made ill by the lead in old book illustrations—not surprisingly, since unlike poorly maintained wall paint, book pigments do not tend to flake off in large lead-laden chips for toddlers to put into their mouths.

The Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) issued regulations regarding the resale of used books, which said that only those made after 1985 could be considered safe. This threw book resellers and libraries into a kind of legal limbo about what to do with their pre-1985 books. Regrettably, in some instances this led some libraries to perform quite unnecessary mass book disposal and destruction.

The CPSIA hit newer books hard, too. The CPSC issued guidance that books intended for children’s use would have to be tested in order to meet the law’s lead limits. There was vigorous debate about this requirement. The American Library Association, for instance, concluded that “Our analysis is that neither the law nor the legislative history indicates any Congressional intention to include books and even textbooks in the law.” The ALA may be right about Congressional intent. However, the text of the law is broad, and it did indeed include books.

The uproar about CPSIA’s effect on older books, as well as the burdensome requirements that new books would face under the law, led Congress to amend CPSIA. In 2011, Congress passed legislation that removed the testing requirements for many new books. It also said that testing to comply with CPSIA’s lead standards did not apply to products made prior to the setting of these standards.

It was nice of Senator Pryor and the rest of Congress to make CPSIA’s effect on books a little less onerous. But perhaps it would have been better to do the legislative job right the first time. No one could reasonably think that books will cause lead poisoning in children. There was no need to have three years of disruption, advocacy, and confusion to settle this issue—to say nothing of the extraordinary waste and destruction of books that Senator Pryor’s CPSIA triggered.

 

Filed Under: Arkansas Democrats, Elections, Government, Law, Legislation & Regulation, Smaller Government Tagged With: Arkansas, Arkansas blogs, CPSIA, Government, legislation, Mark Pryor, overregulation, Policy, Politics, regulation, Toy Recalls, Toy Regulation, toy safety

Donate

Donate Here

Tipping -- it ain't just for cows. Consider making a tax-deductible donation to keep your favorite Arkansas blog going by clicking on the tip jar.

Receive News + Updates

Get our latest updates right in your inbox! Use this form to sign up today!

Stay Connected

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • RSS Feed
  • Google+
  • Pinterest

Search Our Website

Categories

Brought to you by:

AAI banner

Advance Arkansas App

app_aai  

Click here to download the AAI app to your iPhone or iPad.

Twitter Feed

Tweets by @ArkansasProject

Popular Posts

  • Recent Posts
  • Recent Comments
  • Most Commented
  • Most Viewed
  • Tags
  • Legislators Name Possible Sales Tax Exemptions for Elimination
  • Arkansas Lagging in Occupational License Reform
  • Has the NRA Bought Rep. French Hill?
  • Film Subsidies under Scrutiny Nationwide
  • How Does Arkansas Compare to Other States on Taxes?
  • Walter Burgess
  • Mike
  • thomas
  • Ye Editor
  • Ye Editor
  • Jan Morgan’s Big Problem
  • The Governor’s Good Move on Freedom to Work
  • Medicaid Work Requirement Gets Green Light
  • Jan Morgan’s Big Problem
  • How Does Arkansas Compare to Other States on Taxes?
  • Tort Reform and the “Value of Human Life”
  • By All Means, Let’s Talk about “Loser Pays”
  • The Governor’s Good Move on Freedom to Work
  • 2nd Amendment
  • 2010 Senate race
  • AAI
  • advance arkansas institute
  • Arkansas
  • Arkansas bloggers
  • Arkansas blogs
  • Arkansas Governor
  • Arkansas Legislature
  • asa hutchinson
  • Blanche Lincoln
  • Dan Greenberg
  • David Sanders
  • Democrats
  • Dustin McDaniel
  • Elections
  • FOIA
  • Government
  • Governor Mike Beebe
  • guns
  • health care
  • Jonesboro
  • legislature
  • Leslie Rutledge
  • Mark Pryor
  • medicaid
  • Medicaid expansion
  • Mike Beebe
  • Mike Huckabee
  • obama
  • obamacare
  • Policy
  • Politics
  • private option
  • Reform
  • Republicans
  • second amendment
  • spending
  • taxes
  • tax reform
  • tea party
  • Tom Cotton
  • tort reform
  • transparency
  • voter ID

Blogroll

  • Advance Arkansas Institute
  • Cato @ Liberty
  • Independent Arkansas
  • Jay Greene on Education Reform
  • Lance Turner
  • Our Voices Arkansas
  • The Arkansas Times
  • The City Wire, Fort Smith

Blog Archives

About Us

  • Advertising / Media Inquiries
  • Privacy Policy
  • Commenting Policy

Podcast Returning Soon

Podcast

Subscribe to Podcast

on iTuneson Androidvia RSS

Copyright © 2008-2013 · The Arkansas Project · Powered by: footer_white