Everybody Hopes This Is The Last Time I Write About Jason Rapert For A While

AAAA1912-ford-model-tSenator Jason Rapert’s newest defense of the private option is remarkable:

I voted for the Private Option which moves people from the traditional government provided free Medicaid system to the utilization of private insurance because it bridges people to the concept of having individual consumer choice which helps move them from a government handout to being responsible for their own medical decisions. The Private Option, paired with the creation of the Medicaid Inspector General office to reduce fraud and waste and other reforms was the best we could do for our state at the time. The fact is, in the absence of Obamacare, moving people from free traditional Medicaid to the use of private insurance is a classic conservative proposal.

This defense of the private option is remarkable, mainly because it’s wrong. After reading it, one might conclude that Rapert doesn’t even understand the program he voted for.

First, Rapert is simply wrong on the facts: the private option doesn’t move anyone from Medicaid to anything. In fact, the private option creates a new entitlement for hundreds of thousands of Arkansans who have never been on Medicaid. In other words, before Arkansas passed the private option, its recipients were not entitlement clients. Thanks in part to Jason Rapert, now they are. Typically, when someone says that expanding the welfare state by creating a new entitlement is a “classic conservative proposal,” it suggests that the speaker is using a highly unusual, out-of-the-mainstream definition of “conservative.” A “classic conservative proposal” will roll the welfare state back, not expand it.

Second, it bears repeating that Rapert claims he wanted to “replace the free Traditional Medicaid system that is broken and everyone agrees should be reformed.” I endorse this goal: regrettably, the private option replaces nothing. The private option reforms have left Arkansas’s traditional Medicaid system largely untouched. What the private option did was, for the most part, ignore the broken Medicaid system – a broken Medicaid system that, under the private option, continues to shamble dysfunctionally on – and build a new, second system for a new class of private-option clients on top of it. The private option is nothing but a new entitlement that has many of traditional Medicaid’s defects. The private option doesn’t fix what Rapert calls a “broken system” — it’s still broken.

Third, the private option was a very bad deal for Arkansans who believe in and wanted to see real Medicaid reform: not only did it avoid reforming the current system of Medicaid, but it carried out Medicaid expansion without enacting real reforms involving consumer choice. Arkansas should have reformed Medicaid the way that Florida, Kansas, and Louisiana have – by injecting choice into the Medicaid system. Those states’ reforms provide a big contrast with the private option, because (for instance) under Florida Medicaid, patients can choose up to 35 customized benefit packages, offered by up to 14 health plans. What’s crucial here is that, unlike the private option, other states’ benefit packages can vary cost-sharing requirements, services, and benefits. Arkansas’s private option allows the illusion of choice, but the illusion is dispelled when the observer realizes that all the plans offer the same benefits; the barren system of choice that Rapert praises is like Henry Ford’s, in which he offered his Model T to consumers in “any color – so long as it’s black.” The Advance Arkansas Institute has previously published guidance on the way that successful Medicaid reform proposals in other states, unlike the private option, actually offer meaningful choice. Other states have achieved the gold standard in Medicaid reform; private option advocates, including Rapert, settled for dross.

It’s distressing for me to see my state senator succumb to the pessimism of low expectations; it’s bizarre for him to say that “the private option was the best we could do for Arkansas,” because his negativism is unsupported by the reality of Medicaid reform success that other states have seen. As Jack Welch once noted, “Nothing of any importance has ever been accomplished by a pessimist.”

Comments

  1. I hope you never stop writing about Jason Rapert and the lie that the “private option” is somehow “conservative.” Good for you! Keep up the excellent work! And since Jason Rapert loves to quote the Bible when it suits him, how about this one: “The truth shall set you free.”

    Instead of trying to convince people that a massive new entitlement program is actually “conservative,” maybe Mr. Rapert could just come clean and admit that simply isn’t true. Not holding my breath. He seems to have taken lessons from Slick Willy on how to make words mean whatever he wants them to mean.

  2. Keith Chrestman says:

    If Rapert is foolish enough to keep talking, you should feel free to keep reporting. After a while, he might even realize how convoluted his reasoning is.

  3. Interesting that considering all the other votes for this legislation you have decided to pull out one sitting Senator. I challenge you to address each House and Senate member and let them also explain their vote. Otherwise you’re just a another biased reporter putting a target on the back of one politician while letting all the others slide.

  4. Assumption tends to lead to folly, which is why is best avoided. Put all the congressmen on a chart with their votes and interview them individually as to why they voted to pass Medicaid expansion.

  5. You don’t know, or is that a quiz? You authored this article, and I’m not inclined to do your research for you.

  6. Looks like Rapert wasn’t only R Senator who voted for this to pass:http://votesmart.org/bill/votes/43636#.UsMX7NJDtlx

  7. Amber, are you kidding? Senator Rapert is Nic’s senator. Senator Rapert spoke extensively at a Tea Party meeting I attended last year, explaining what an unwise policy it would be to expand Medicaid. Senator Rapert personally attacked Nic, charging that his articles were inaccurate. Senator Rapert recently issued a 1500-word statement attempting to justify his ‘private option’ decision. I am not sure you understand what the word ‘bias’ means.

  8. Let us all understand the concepts being foisted on the Arkansas taxpayer by all D’s and many R’s.
    The Federal government regulates the PO plan features (exactly like Medicare)
    The State government manages the PO plan.(can anyone say “expansion”)
    Private insurance administers the plan (while being guaranteed 15-20% profit)
    Some of the increased recipients will surely exploit eligibility for the expanded plan.
    The taxpayers (State or Federal still = us!) pay for it all!
    How can this not save money and reduce government, obviously conservative!
    Can anyone truly believe that this new multilayer boondoggle will help anyone and not ultimately cause more harm to the provider of the benefit as well as the recipients. All good for the State apparatus, hospitals, and insurance companies though!

    Sen.Rapert needs to man up and end this in the fiscal session.

Speak Your Mind

*