<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Culture Shock: Sotomayor and the Rule of Law</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thearkansasproject.com/culture-shock-sotomayor-and-the-rule-of-law/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thearkansasproject.com/culture-shock-sotomayor-and-the-rule-of-law/</link>
	<description>News and Views on Politics, Policy and More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 16:41:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barbara - LINK HERE to additional comments</title>
		<link>http://www.thearkansasproject.com/culture-shock-sotomayor-and-the-rule-of-law/#comment-2911</link>
		<dc:creator>Barbara - LINK HERE to additional comments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 21:47:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thearkansasproject.com/?p=6748#comment-2911</guid>
		<description>Additional comments of interest.  Not necessarily my view; but useful to get the full picture of this nomination.

The author is a black psychologist.

Worth the read.  Click on link (name) above, or here:  http://capitolhillcoffeehouse.com/more.php?id=7356_0_1_0_M</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Additional comments of interest.  Not necessarily my view; but useful to get the full picture of this nomination.</p>
<p>The author is a black psychologist.</p>
<p>Worth the read.  Click on link (name) above, or here:  <a href="http://capitolhillcoffeehouse.com/more.php?id=7356_0_1_0_M" rel="nofollow">http://capitolhillcoffeehouse.com/more.php?id=7356_0_1_0_M</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barbara - SHOULD FELONS HAVE THE RIGHT TO VOTE??</title>
		<link>http://www.thearkansasproject.com/culture-shock-sotomayor-and-the-rule-of-law/#comment-2910</link>
		<dc:creator>Barbara - SHOULD FELONS HAVE THE RIGHT TO VOTE??</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 19:27:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thearkansasproject.com/?p=6748#comment-2910</guid>
		<description>Should CONVICTED FELONS have the right to vote?  According to this editorial, that is what Sotomayor said in dissent in Hayden v. Pataki (although 8 other judges disagreed with her on that point).

Does the Voting Rights Act require giving FELONS the right to vote?  Don&#039;t think so; and it appears that I would disagree with the learned nominee to SCOTUS.

More scrutiny required.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Should CONVICTED FELONS have the right to vote?  According to this editorial, that is what Sotomayor said in dissent in Hayden v. Pataki (although 8 other judges disagreed with her on that point).</p>
<p>Does the Voting Rights Act require giving FELONS the right to vote?  Don&#8217;t think so; and it appears that I would disagree with the learned nominee to SCOTUS.</p>
<p>More scrutiny required.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barbara</title>
		<link>http://www.thearkansasproject.com/culture-shock-sotomayor-and-the-rule-of-law/#comment-2909</link>
		<dc:creator>Barbara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 19:01:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thearkansasproject.com/?p=6748#comment-2909</guid>
		<description>Glad to see that someone is interested in this nomination.

Don&#039;t know what her judicial philosophy is; don&#039;t know about her abilities.

Will wait to see what develops.

Sorry:  can&#039;t take the Rush Limbaugh talking points any more than I can take the Obama talking points on this nomination.

She may well be confirmed; and she may well be one of three or even four nominees that Obama makes to the Supreme Court.  But that doesn&#039;t mean that any nominee does not deserve scrutiny.

The fate of our Republic depends on it.

PLEASE TELL US MORE and give links, cites, or facts to support what you have to say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad to see that someone is interested in this nomination.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t know what her judicial philosophy is; don&#8217;t know about her abilities.</p>
<p>Will wait to see what develops.</p>
<p>Sorry:  can&#8217;t take the Rush Limbaugh talking points any more than I can take the Obama talking points on this nomination.</p>
<p>She may well be confirmed; and she may well be one of three or even four nominees that Obama makes to the Supreme Court.  But that doesn&#8217;t mean that any nominee does not deserve scrutiny.</p>
<p>The fate of our Republic depends on it.</p>
<p>PLEASE TELL US MORE and give links, cites, or facts to support what you have to say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Culture Shock: Sotomayor and the Rule of Law &#124; The Arkansas Project &#171; Culture Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.thearkansasproject.com/culture-shock-sotomayor-and-the-rule-of-law/#comment-2908</link>
		<dc:creator>Culture Shock: Sotomayor and the Rule of Law &#124; The Arkansas Project &#171; Culture Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 18:08:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thearkansasproject.com/?p=6748#comment-2908</guid>
		<description>[...] Read the original here: Culture Shock: Sotomayor and the Rule of Law &#124; The Arkansas Project [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read the original here: Culture Shock: Sotomayor and the Rule of Law | The Arkansas Project [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

