<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Annual Sessions? Bring &#8216;Em On!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thearkansasproject.com/annual-sessions-bring-em-on/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thearkansasproject.com/annual-sessions-bring-em-on/</link>
	<description>News and Views on Politics, Policy and More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 16:41:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Green</title>
		<link>http://www.thearkansasproject.com/annual-sessions-bring-em-on/#comment-923</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Green</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 17:47:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thearkansasproject.com/?p=3235#comment-923</guid>
		<description>I guess I&#039;ll have to be the first to stand up and say I have talked to constituents in my area and they felt that annual session made more sense than projecting a state budget for two years out in today&#039;s economy.  These folks weren&#039;t duped by a ballot title as some would say.  They fully understood what the initiative entailed and understood that, yes, there is a cost associated with a limited second session.  It seems they made a decison made on sound judgement contrary to what all of the nay-sayers and hand wringing folks are trying to spin out there.  I give the citizens of Arkansas more credit than some and am pleased that a huge majority weren&#039;t influenced by lobby groups and the press.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess I&#8217;ll have to be the first to stand up and say I have talked to constituents in my area and they felt that annual session made more sense than projecting a state budget for two years out in today&#8217;s economy.  These folks weren&#8217;t duped by a ballot title as some would say.  They fully understood what the initiative entailed and understood that, yes, there is a cost associated with a limited second session.  It seems they made a decison made on sound judgement contrary to what all of the nay-sayers and hand wringing folks are trying to spin out there.  I give the citizens of Arkansas more credit than some and am pleased that a huge majority weren&#8217;t influenced by lobby groups and the press.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

